Contributions - Making Space for Trans and Non-binary Lives in the Workplace

Brewis

Contributions - Making Space for Trans and Non-binary Lives in the Workplace

Post by Brewis »

Making Space for Trans and Non-binary Lives in the Workplace
Routledge

Editors
Saoirse O’Shea (Open University, UK)
Ilaria Boncori (University of Essex, UK)
Olga Suhomlinova (University of Leicester, UK)

Call for chapter contributions

This edited collection brings together academic research and personal experiences on trans and non-binary lives. The book aims to provide a space for trans and non-binary lives, and to foster critical and interdisciplinary engagement with the topic. In particular, we wish to explore the complexity and criticality of the trans and non-binary experience in organisations and ways of organising.

We invite the contributors to think about space and space-making on a wide continuum from literal/concrete to figurative/abstract.

In a more literal sense, one could consider the social production and reproduction of space conceived as physical milieu, or ‘practico-sensory realm’ (Lefebvre, 1991 [1974], p. 15), in which life transpires and all human activities happen. The roots of such approach run back to George Simmel’s Sociology of Space (1903) and, more recently, to Henri Lefèbvre’s The Production of Space (1974) and David Harvey’s (1973) Social Justice and the City, which prompted the spatial turn in human geography, sociology (Fuller and Löw, 2017; Löw, 2008; Urry, 2001), and organisation studies (Beyes and Holt, 2020; van Marrewijk and Yanow, 2010). This socio-spatial tradition, and theory and research on gendered spaces in particular (Löw, 2006; Spain, 2014), could furnish support and inspiration, as would the studies of organisational/organising spaces and places, where trans bodies and identities are interrogated and policed by the nation-state security and surveillance apparatuses (e.g., airport border controls (Beauchamp, 2019; Currah and Mulqueen, 2011; Quinan and Bresser, 2020)) and by the local authorities, employers, professional associations, and/or citizen activist groups (e.g., toilets/washrooms/bathrooms and changing/locker rooms (Davies, Vipond and King, 2017; Herman, 2013; Human Rights Watch, 2016; Keegan, 2016; Rudin, Ruane, Ross, Farro and Billing, 2014; Rudin, Yang, Ruane, Ross, Farro and Billing, 2016; Sanders and Stryker, 2016; Schilt and Westbrook, 2015; Westbrook and Schilt, 2014)).

As well as fuelling further explorations of the ‘tyranny of gendered spaces’ (Doan, 2010), the socio-spatial imagination may inspire one to take on the ‘mobilities’ approach (Urry, 2007) and follow the journeys of ‘displaced’ trans nomads/migrants, in perpetual motion from rural to urban areas, one state to another, and one employer to the next in search of liveable lives (Gieseking, 2023; Mizock and Hopwood, 2018). It may also propel one to venture into digital/virtual/cyber spaces, as the boundaries between digital and social spaces become increasingly blurred (Auriemma, Iorio, Merico and Tavares Galindo Filho, 2024), and given the importance of digital platforms for trans individuals and communities since the early days of WorldWideWeb (Cannon, Speedlin, Avera, Robertson, Ingram and Prado, 2017; Cavalcante, 2016; Steinbock, 2019).

In a more metaphorical sense, one may attend to ideational, symbolic, semiotic, discursive, emotional/affective, and other similar spaces, to ponder about making space for the following and other related issues

• trans and non-binary research and researchers in academia (beyond the ‘diversity hires’ and gender studies ‘ghettoes’) (Brice, 2023; Gill-Peterson, 2023; Nordmarken, 2014);
• non-binary in the LGBTQIA+ acronym;
• unrestrained depictions of gender diversity (say, as a constellation, rather than a continuum, as recently suggested (Suhomlinova, O’Shea and Boncori, 2024));
• trans and non-binary self-representations in traditional and social media;

Similarly, we welcome the unbounded interpretations of ‘the workplace’, beyond the typical inquiries into experiences of trans and non-binary employees and attitudes and behaviours towards them of their cis co-workers, managers, and/or clients (Law, Martinez, Ruggs, Hebl and Akers, 2011; Martinez, Sawyer, Thoroughgood, Ruggs and Smith, 2017; McFadden and Crowley-Henry, 2016; Mizock and Mueser, 2014; Mizock, Woodrum, Riley, Sotilleo, Yuen and Ormerod, 2017; Ozturk and Tatli, 2015; Phoenix and Ghul, 2016; Ruggs, Martinez, Hebl and Law, 2015; Schilt, 2006; Schilt and Connell, 2007; Schilt and Wiswall, 2008; Thoroughgood and Sawyer, 2017; Totaljobs, 2016; Yavorsky, 2016). Thus, we would invite investigations of the place/space accorded to real (or imaginary) trans and non-binary people in the organisations that make high-level decisions about their entire populations, such as (to illustrate with recent examples from the UK):

• the Supreme Court deciding whether trans women qualify women for the purposes of gender representation on public boards (Gibb, 2024);
• Office for National Statistics reclassifying its official Census 2021 statistics on trans population in England as ‘experimental’ (Booth, 2024);
• NHS closing the Tavistock Gender Identity Development Service;
• HM Prison Service redrawing the rules for (re)allocating trans prisoners to the estate of their gender (Suhomlinova and O'Shea, 2025);
• Advance HE failing to report ‘trans status’ of two thirds of university staff and students in the UK (Advance HE, 2022, p. 270)

Through the inclusion of personal stories and experiences from trans and non-binary people, the book will foster nuanced understandings of everyday experiences, and will provide a space for a community of belonging within and beyond academia.

To explore the nuances and complexities of the trans and non-binary experience, we particularly welcome critical approaches and chapters written ‘differently’. ‘Researching and Writing Differently’ approaches (Boncori, 2022; Kostera, 2022; Pullen, Helin and Harding, 2022) are increasingly used in management and organizational studies to shed light on silenced topics; explore non-traditional ways of knowing; rethink the way we research and work together in academia; experiment with creative, personal, embodied and affective methods; reflect and engage with academic praxes of reading, writing, editing and reviewing differently. Autoethnographic works by one of the editors (O’Shea, 2018; O’Shea, 2019; O’Shea, 2020;
O’Shea, 2021) may provide inspiration and encouragement in that direction.

Contributions

It is expected that the majority of contributions may come from business school-based academics/management and organisation scholars, but we welcome interdisciplinary approaches and chapters from other disciplines. While many of the chapters are likely to have a UK focus, we particularly welcome submissions from other geographic areas and cultural backgrounds outside the UK.

The book, therefore, aims to provide a space for nuanced expressions and understandings of trans and non-binary lives in the workplace by exploring the following areas/topics:

- Inclusion, assimilation and adjustments
- Visible and invisible exclusionary practices in the workplace
- Trans and non-binary lives: boundaries and liminalities
- Trans and non-binary lives in the arts
- Workplace experiences across professional contexts
- Trans and non-binary experiences
- Doing research methods differently to understand trans and non-binary lives
- Language, voice and communication
- The body, embodiment and the workplace
- Legal and ethical issues
- Personal testimonies and autoethnographic accounts of trans and non-binary lives at work
- Academia and academic careers for trans and non-binary people.

Publication information

We have a signed contract with Routledge for the book to be published in early 2027. We invite the initial submissions of a 500-word abstract, to be followed by full chapters of 5,000-7,000 words, inclusive of references (shorter contributions will also be considered, particularly for
personal narratives).

Please submit expressions of interest in the form of a 500-word abstract to all editors at: Saoirse O’Shea saoirse.oshea@open.ac.uk; Ilaria Boncori iboncori@essex.ac.uk; Olga Suhomlinova o.suhomlinova@le.ac.uk

Deadlines

Abstract submission deadline: Monday 16 April 2025
Notifications of decisions on the abstracts: 31 May 2025
Full Chapters deadline: 18 November 2025

References

Advance HE. 2022. Equality + higher education: Staff statistical report 2022. Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge- ... ports-2022 [Accessed 5 January 2023].
Auriemma, V., Iorio, G., Merico, M. and Tavares Galindo Filho, L. 2024. Editorial: Blurring boundaries: reconfiguring social and digital spaces. Front Sociol, 9, 1420030.
Beauchamp, T. 2019. Going Stealth: Transgender Politics and U.S. Surveillance Practices, Durham, NC, Duke University Press.
Beyes, T. and Holt, R. 2020. The Topographical Imagination: Space and organization theory. Organization Theory, 1.
Boncori, I. 2022. Researching and Writing Differently, Bristol, UK, Polity.
Booth, R. 2024. Official estimate of trans population in England and Wales dropped by ONS. The Guardian, 12 September 2024.
Brice, S. 2023. Making space for a radical trans imagination: Towards a kinder, more vulnerable, geography. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 41, 592-599.
Cannon, Y., Speedlin, S., Avera, J., Robertson, D., Ingram, M. and Prado, A. 2017. Transition, Connection, Disconnection, and Social Media: Examining the Digital Lived Experiences of Transgender Individuals. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 11, 68-87.
Cavalcante, A. 2016. “I Did It All Online:” Transgender identity and the management of everyday life. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33, 109-122.
Currah, P. and Mulqueen, T. 2011. Securitizing Gender: Identity, Biometrics, and Transgender Bodies at the Airport. Social Research, 78, 557-582.
Davies, A. W. J., Vipond, E. and King, A. 2017. Gender binary washrooms as a means of gender policing in schools: a Canadian perspective. Gender and Education, 1-20.
Doan, P. L. 2010. The tyranny of gendered spaces – reflections from beyond the gender dichotomy. Gender, Place & Culture, 17, 635-654.
Fuller, M. G. and Löw, M. 2017. Introduction: An invitation to spatial sociology. Current Sociology, 65, 469-491.
Gieseking, J. J. 2023. Reflections on a cis discipline. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 41, 571-591.
Gill-Peterson, J. 2023. General Editor's Introduction: The Graduate School of Trans Studies. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 10, 1-9.
Herman, J. L. 2013. Gendered restrooms and minority stress: The public regulation of gender and its impact on transgender people’s lives. Journal of Public Management and Social Policy, 19, 65-80.
Human Rights Watch. 2016. Shut Out: Restrictions on Bathroom and Locker Room Access for Transgender Youth in US Schools. New York, NY: Human Rights Watch. [Accessed].
Keegan, C. M. 2016. On Being the Object of Compromise. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 3, 150-157.
Kostera, M. (ed.) 2022. How to Write Differently: A Quest for Meaningful Academic Writing. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Law, C. L., Martinez, L. R., Ruggs, E. N., Hebl, M. R. and Akers, E. 2011. Trans-parency in the workplace: How the experiences of transsexual employees can be improved. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 710-723.
Lefebvre, H. 1991 [1974]. The Production of Space, Oxford, UK, and Cambridge, USA, Blackwell.
Löw, M. 2006. The Social Construction of Space and Gender. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13, 119-133.
Löw, M. 2008. The Constitution of Space. European Journal of Social Theory, 11, 25-49.
Martinez, L. R., Sawyer, K. B., Thoroughgood, C. N., Ruggs, E. N. and Smith, N. A. 2017. The importance of being "me": The relation between authentic identity expression and transgender employees' work-related attitudes and experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 215-226.
McFadden, C. and Crowley-Henry, M. 2016. A systematic literature review on trans* careers and workplace experiences. In: Köllen, T. (ed.) Sexual Orientation and Transgender Issues in Organizations. pp. 63-82: Springer, Cham.
Mizock, L. and Hopwood, R. 2018. Economic challenges associated with transphobia and implications for practice with transgender and gender diverse individuals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 49, 65-74.
Mizock, L. and Mueser, K. T. 2014. Employment, mental health, internalized stigma, and
coping with transphobia among transgender individuals. Psychology of Sexual
Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1, 146-158.
Mizock, L., Woodrum, T. D., Riley, J., Sotilleo, E. A., Yuen, N. and Ormerod, A. J. 2017. Coping with transphobia in employment: Strategies used by transgender and gender-diverse people in the United States. International Journal of Transgenderism, 18, 282-294.
Nordmarken, S. 2014. Becoming Ever More Monstrous. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 37-50.
O’Shea, S. C. 2018. ‘I, Robot?’ Or how transgender subjects are dehumanised. Culture and Organization, 1-13.
O’Shea, S. C. 2019. Cutting my dick off. Culture and Organization, 25, 272-283.
O’Shea, S. C. 2020. Working at gender? An autoethnography. Gender, Work & Organization, 27, 1438-1449.
O’Shea, S. C. 2021. If I knew then what I know now. Gender, Work & Organization, 29, 626-638.
Ozturk, M. B. and Tatli, A. 2015. Gender identity inclusion in the workplace: broadening diversity management research and practice through the case of transgender employees in the UK. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 781-802.
Phoenix, N. and Ghul, R. 2016. Gender transition in the workplace: An occupational therapy perspective. Work, 55, 197-205.
Pullen, A., Helin, J. and Harding, N. (eds.) 2022. Writing Differently, Leeds, UK: Emerald Publishing.
Quinan, C. L. and Bresser, N. 2020. Gender at the Border: Global Responses to Gender-Diverse Subjectivities and Nonbinary Registration Practices. Global Perspectives, 1.
Rudin, J., Ruane, S., Ross, L., Farro, A. and Billing, T. 2014. Hostile territory: employers’ unwillingness to accommodate transgender employees. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 33, 721-734.
Rudin, J., Yang, Y., Ruane, S., Ross, L., Farro, A. and Billing, T. 2016. Transforming Attitudes About Transgender Employee Rights. Journal of Management Education, 40, 30-46.
Ruggs, E. N., Martinez, L. R., Hebl, M. R. and Law, C. L. 2015. Workplace “trans”-actions: How organizations, coworkers, and individual openness influence perceived gender identity discrimination. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2, 404-412.
Sanders, J. and Stryker, S. 2016. Stalled: Gender-Neutral Public Bathrooms. South Atlantic Quarterly, 115, 779-788.
Schilt, K. 2006. Just One of the Guys? Gender & Society, 20, 465-490.
Schilt, K. and Connell, C. 2007. Do workplace gender transitions make gender trouble? Gender, Work and Organization, 14, 596-618.
Schilt, K. and Westbrook, L. 2015. Bathroom Battlegrounds and Penis Panics. Contexts, 14, 26-31.
Schilt, K. and Wiswall, M. 2008. Before and After: Gender Transitions, Human Capital, and Workplace Experiences. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8, 1-26.
Spain, D. 2014. Gender and Urban Space. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 581-598.
Steinbock, E. 2019. The Early 1990s and Its Afterlives: Transgender Nation Sociality in Digital Activism. Social Media + Society, 5.
Suhomlinova, O. and O'Shea, S. C. 2025. Transgender and Non-binary Prisoners' Experiences in England and Wales, Leeds, UK, Emerald Publishing.
Suhomlinova, O., O’Shea, S. C. and Boncori, I. 2024. Rethinking gender diversity: Transgender and gender nonconforming people and gender as constellation. Gender, Work & Organization, 31, 1766–1785.
Thoroughgood, C. and Sawyer, K. 2017. Research: Why Employer Support Is So Important for Transgender Employees. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, 10, 2-6.
Totaljobs. 2016. Trans Employee Experiences Survey. Available at: www.totaljobs.com/insidejob/trans-emplo ... eport-2016. Accessed 10 March 2018. Totaljobs. [Accessed].
Urry, J. 2001. The sociology of space and place. In: Blau, J. R. (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Sociology. pp.: John Wiley & Sons.
Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities, Cambridge, UK, Polity.
van Marrewijk, A. and Yanow, D. (eds.) 2010. Organizational Spaces, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Westbrook, L. and Schilt, K. 2014. Doing gender, determining gender. Gender & Society, 28, 32-57.
Yavorsky, J. E. 2016. Cisgendered Organizations: Trans Women and Inequality in the Workplace. Sociological Forum, 31, 948-969.